Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  6 / 11 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 6 / 11 Next Page
Page Background

21%

20%

20%

16%

9%

9%

4%

1%

Chart 1: Views on PNP Skipping the National Debate

Felt cheated/political 

right (65)

Felt insulted (60)

Robbed of chance to 

interrogate Andrew (61)

Damaged election vibes 

(48)

Thought it was good 

strategy to skip (28)

Debate is waste of time 

(26)

Debate reignited dislike 

for Portia (13)

No response on issue (3)

Table 4: Respondents Offended by PNP Skipping the National Debate by Gender, SES and Age 

SES/AGE 

MALES 

FEMALES 

PN 18‐34Y 

17 

20 

53 

PN35+Y 

21 

23 

46 

UM 18‐34Y 

14 

50 

32 

84

UM 35+Y 

10 

28 

26 

57 

The data in Table 5 and Chart 2 show the distribution (in percentage) of the other responses to the 

debate issue by the categorical variables. The outstanding areas are highlighted in red.  

Wanting to question the JLP about the proposed tax break: 

All 14 respondents in the study 

from the merchant class had concerns about the proposed tax break. They argued that “any 

such thing about tax affects your business negatively or positively…and Andrew gets to drop this 

as a bait for the poor people and walk away…and no chance to hear what it is about…they have 

not given any convincing detail…there is need for clarity.” These 14 merchants helped to push 

the UM groups to result higher percentages.  

Damaged election vibes:

With the exception of 3 UM mature females who grew up as working 

class, only the poor and near‐poor missed the debate for the purpose of “setting the stage for