Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  5 / 11 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 5 / 11 Next Page
Page Background

Table 3: Breakdown of Respondents 

 CATEGORIES 

MALES 

FEMALES 

PN 18‐34Y 

30 

38 

PN 35+Y 

38 

50 

UM 18‐34Y 

28 

38 

UM 35+Y 

36 

46 

TOTAL 

132 

(43%) 

172  

(57%) 

The PNP’s skip of the National Debate 

The data in Chart 1 show that the debate was important to Jamaicans. A significant number of persons 

(138 or 45%) felt offended by the PNP skipping the debate: 21% felt cheated of their right to be 

informed via the exchange, 20% felt insulted, and 4% were so angered that they expressed explicit 

dislike for the Leader of the PNP (with all of the latter stating that they had disliked much about her but 

that such dislike had waned between 2007 and days before the 2016 General Election). Twenty percent 

(20%) of respondents felt the PNP’s skip of the debate robbed them of the chance to see Andrew 

Holness and his team defend their proposed tax break; and another 16% felt the absence of the debate 

“killed the election vibes, ” which impacted voter turn‐out. Nonetheless, 9% of respondents thought it 

was a commendable strategy on the part of the PNP to skip the debate; but most lamented that it 

backfired. Nine percent (9%) of the respondents expressed that “debates are usually a waste of precious 

time.”     

Calculations show that 62% of all the females were offended by the skipping of the debate, compared to 

29% of the males; 53% of the young were offended, compared to 39% of the mature; and 36% of the 

poor and near‐poor were offended, compared to 55% of the upper middle and middle classes combined. 

These figures show that gender was the primary categorical variable, followed by class and maturity in 

ranked order. The data in Table 4 represent a multivariate examination using the 3 categorical variables. 

Young poor and near‐poor (PN) males were the least offended (17%), followed by mature PN males 

(21%). Young upper middle and middle class (UM) females were the most offended (84%), followed by 

more mature women of the same classes. More than a half of young PN females were also offended 

(53%). Note too that young educated males were the only male group with 50% or more being 

offended. The most critical point to note from this section of the data is that

 young middle and upper 

middle class females are likely to be the most critical of any action considered to be a breach of their 

democratic rights.

 Throughout the ‘Why Jamaicans Vote’ study they were the most critical of Jamaican 

politics, and had the highest degree of apathy. As we shall see later, 

their apathy was turned to protest 

very late in the run up to the election.