Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  10 / 11 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 10 / 11 Next Page
Page Background

Impact on the JLP 

o

The lack of a debate and the problems created by the proposed tax break encouraged 

24 of the 120 JLPs in the study. Eighteen (18) of these respondents stated explicitly that 

they would not have gone to vote if the combination of the PNP skipping the debate and 

their struggles with the tax offer did not present some degree of hope. One UM mature 

female explained how it affected her: “I had given up even when they were talking 

about 1.5 million; but when I hear Andrew break it down to the $18,000, and see the 

PNP struggling with it, I called my husband to drive up from the country to come and 

vote. I reasoned that it was not important whether or not it can work. Jamaican people 

love freeness. It did sell off.”  

Impact on the Uncommitted 

o

Eleven young (5 males, 6 females) uncommitted respondents voted JLP due to being 

turned off by the PNP’s skipping of the debate 

o

Four (4) males and 1 female voted PNP due to feeling insulted by the proposed tax 

break. 

o

Eleven (11) working class uncommitted (5 males, 6 females) were drawn to the JLP by 

the proposed tax break and voted.   

Other issues that affected the Uncommitted 

Baby scandal and how it was treated: 3 uncommitted females voted JLP 

Andrew’s house: 9 working class males voted for the PNP  

Shifting of youth Pryce and Crawford: 8 young UM female ‐ JLP  

The net positive impact of 74 for the JLP represents 24% of the sample, compared to the PNP’s 28 or 

9.2% (see Chart 4). The bottom line is that when calculated the JLP benefitted from the net effect of the 

PNP skipping the debate and the tax break offered, combined with 3 secondary issues. The skipping of 

the debate was mostly negative for the PNP, while the proposed tax break was mostly positive for the 

JLP or trivialized. Had the PNP gone ahead and participated in the debate there would have been no 

major shift. The JLP would not have had the tremendous space they had to manoeuvre. Throughout the 

study people (especially females) expressed that they felt triggered to protest against the Leader of the 

PNP when she showed too much confidence on the day of the election “expressing that she could not 

lose – knowing very well that she just ducked from the debate I wanted to hear.” Note that 5 women 

expressed that their trigger to vote against “Portia – not the PNP,” came as late as Election Day. The PNP 

could have remained in power had they participated in the National Debate.